Correct option is B
The Pramāṇa that is differentiated into
Svārtha (inference for oneself) and
Parārtha (inference for others) is
Anumāna (inference).
Anumāna (inference):
·
Svārtha Anumāna: The process of reasoning used by an individual to arrive at knowledge for their own understanding without explicitly stating the reasoning steps.
·
Parārtha Anumāna: The process of inference presented as a logical argument to convince others, typically structured in five steps (pañcāvayava):
·
Pratijñā: Proposition
·
Hetu: Reason
·
Udāharaṇa: Example
·
Upanaya: Application
·
Nigamana: Conclusion
Information Booster 1.
Types of Anumāna:
·
Svārtha (for oneself): Inference conducted mentally to understand a fact or derive knowledge for personal cognition.
·
Parārtha (for others): A structured inference used to demonstrate or convince others, often presented in debates or discussions.
2.
Pañcāvayava Structure of Parārtha Anumāna:
·
Proposition (Pratijñā): Statement of what is to be proven.
·
Reason (Hetu): Justification for the proposition.
·
Example (Udāharaṇa): Supporting example, with universal concomitance (vyāpti).
·
Application (Upanaya): Relating the example to the specific case.
·
Conclusion (Nigamana): Final logical conclusion.
Additional Knowledge ·
Option (a): Pratyakṣa (perception):
· Direct, immediate knowledge gained through the senses (e.g., seeing a tree). Not divided into Svārtha and Parārtha.
·
Option (c): Upamāna (comparison):
· Involves analogical reasoning (e.g., recognizing a gavaya by comparison to a cow). Does not require separate internal and external differentiation.
·
Option (d): Śabda (verbal testimony):
· Knowledge gained through authoritative verbal sources. While Śabda can be conveyed to others, it does not involve internal inference.