What can be correctly claimed about the following: "I ate because I was hungry"?

Correct option is C

The statement "I ate because I was hungry" is not an argument. It is an explanation because it describes the reason or cause of why the action (eating) occurred. The purpose is to provide clarity, not to persuade or prove a point.
The statement provides a cause-effect relationship where "I was hungry" is the reason for the action "I ate."
The intent is to clarify the reasoning behind the action, not to present evidence for or against a claim.
Information Booster:
Explanations focus on clarifying or providing reasons for events or actions.
Arguments are designed to persuade or establish a claim using logical reasoning.
Misclassifying an explanation as an argument is a common error in reasoning analysis.