Given below are two statements:

Statement I: According to Classical Indian Logicians (Naiyayikas) the inference from the effect to the cause is called Purvävät.

Statement II: According to Naiyāyikas, the inference of cause from the effect is not possible.

In light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options given below:

Correct option is C

Statement I is true. According to Classical Indian Logicians (Naiyayikas), Purvävät refers to the inference of the cause from the effect, such as inferring fire from smoke. Statement II is false because, in Indian logic, the inference of the cause from the effect is possible and commonly accepted.
Information Booster: 1. Purvävät Anumāna: An inference where the cause is inferred from its effect (e.g., inferring the presence of clouds from rain).
2. Cause and Effect: Central to logical reasoning, where the observation of an effect can lead to the inference of its cause.
3. Naiyāyikas: Classical Indian logicians who focused on structured and formal systems of reasoning.
4. Inference in Indian Logic: Plays a critical role in understanding both philosophical and empirical phenomena.
5. Vyāpti in Cause-Effect: The relationship between cause and effect is ensured by the presence of vyāpti in logical inference.
6. Logical Structures: Inferences are drawn from the observation of effects to their underlying causes, which is central to empirical reasoning.