Which of the following statements are true with reference to Nyaya view of logic?
(A) It does not separate deduction from induction
(B) It rejects verbalist view of logic and does not study the forms of thought alone
(C) The formal and material logic are blended in Indian Logic
(D) Verbal form is an integral part of the Inference.
Choose the correct answer from the options given below:

Correct option is C

The analysis is as follows:
· (A) It does not separate deduction from induction: True. Nyaya logic combines both induction and deduction in its reasoning, emphasizing a unified approach to deriving conclusions.
· (B) It rejects verbalist view of logic and does not study the forms of thought alone: True. Nyaya logic considers both the structure of thought and its application to the material world, avoiding an abstract, purely verbalist approach.
· (C) The formal and material logic are blended in Indian Logic: True. Nyaya integrates formal logical methods (e.g., syllogisms) with material conditions and context, making it a comprehensive and practical logical system.
Information Booster 1. Nyaya logic integrates induction and deduction into a seamless reasoning process.
2. The rejection of purely verbal logic distinguishes Nyaya from other schools of philosophy that rely on abstract forms.
3. Combining formal and material logic ensures practical applicability to real-world scenarios.
4. Verbal articulation, while significant in expressing reasoning, is not fundamental to the logic itself.
Additional knowledge:
(D) Verbal form is an integral part of the Inference:
False. While verbal articulation is important in Nyaya syllogism, it is not considered an "integral" or essential part of inference itself. Nyaya prioritizes logical principles over linguistic formulation. The verbal form is a tool for communication, not a necessary condition for inference.