Correct option is B
In the Nyaya philosophy,
Upamāna (comparison) is one of the accepted means of knowledge (
pramāņa). It refers to the knowledge of an unfamiliar object by comparing it to a known object based on a verbal description given beforehand. In this case, the American learns about the buffalo by comparing it to a bison based on his friend’s description. When he sees a buffalo in Asia, he recognizes it because he recalls the comparison made earlier.
Information Booster 1.
Upamāna (Comparison): Knowledge gained by comparing an unfamiliar object with a familiar one based on prior information.
2.
Nyaya Philosophy recognizes four primary
pramāņas: Perception (
Pratyakṣa), Inference (
Anumāna), Comparison (
Upamāna), and Verbal Testimony (
Śabda).
3.
Example of Upamāna: Learning that a
gavaya (wild ox) is like a cow, and recognizing it when you encounter one.
4.
Upamāna bridges the gap between known and unknown entities through a comparative framework.
5. This method is crucial for acquiring knowledge in cases where direct perception or inference alone is insufficient.
Additional Knowledge ·
(a) Postulation (Arthāpatti): This means of knowledge involves presumption or postulation to explain a contradiction. For example, inferring that a person must eat during the day if they do not eat at night. It does not apply to comparison-based recognition.
·
(c) Perception (Pratyakṣa): Direct sensory knowledge of an object. While the American sees the buffalo, his recognition relies on comparison, not direct perception alone.
·
(d) Verbal Testimony (Śabda): This involves gaining knowledge through the words of a reliable authority. Though the friend’s description is verbal, recognition here happens through comparison, not testimony.