Which of the following statements are true regarding Nyaya logic?

A. Inference is from the universal to the particular only.

B. Inference is from the particular to the universal only.

C. Inference is from the particular to the particular only.

D. Inference is from the particular to the particular through the universal.

Choose the correct answer from the option given below:

Correct option is A

The Correct Answer is D only
According to Nyaya logic, inference is drawn from the particular to the particular, but this happens through the universal. For example, we might infer that "Socrates is mortal" (a particular case) because "all men are mortal" (a universal). This form of reasoning follows the structure of moving from a particular instance to a universal truth, and then applying that truth back to another particular instance.
· Statement D is correct, as it accurately describes Nyaya inference.
· Statements A, B, and C are incorrect because they either limit inference to just universal-to-particular or particular-to-universal without acknowledging the role of the universal in the reasoning process.
Information Booster:
1. Nyaya logic: A classical Indian school of philosophy that focuses on valid reasoning (inference) through universal principles.
2. Particular to particular through universal: Nyaya logic emphasizes moving from particular observations, using universal principles, to infer other particular cases.
3. Example of Nyaya inference: "Socrates is mortal" because "all men are mortal" (universal).