Correct option is C
The correct answer is (c) Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association Case (2015)
Explanation:
- The Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association vs Union of India (2015) case is directly linked to the striking down of the 99th Constitutional Amendment.
- This amendment aimed to replace the existing collegium system with the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) for the appointment of judges to the higher judiciary.
- The Supreme Court declared the NJAC unconstitutional and void, stating it violated the basic structure of the Constitution, particularly judicial independence.
- The judgment restored the collegium system, where judges are appointed by a panel of senior judges.
- The verdict emphasized that the executive cannot have a dominant role in judicial appointments.
Information Booster:
- The 99th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2014, and the NJAC Act, 2014, were passed by Parliament and ratified by a majority of states.
- NJAC proposed a six-member body including the Chief Justice of India, two senior judges, Law Minister, and two eminent persons.
- The Supreme Court ruled (4:1 majority) that this compromised the independence of the judiciary.
- The case reaffirmed the doctrine of separation of powers.
- It highlighted the role of judicial review in safeguarding constitutional principles.
Additional Knowledge:
Kesavananda Bharati Case (1973) (Option a)
- Laid down the Basic Structure Doctrine, limiting Parliament's power to amend the Constitution.
- Not related to NJAC directly.
Golaknath Case (1967) (Option b)
- Held that Fundamental Rights cannot be amended by Parliament.
- Preceded Kesavananda Bharati and was overruled partially by it.
Minerva Mills Case (1980) (Option d)
- Reaffirmed the basic structure doctrine, particularly regarding judicial review and balance between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles.
- Not related to judicial appointments.