Correct option is B
Dimension reduction techniques, such as Principal Component Analysis (PCA) or Factor Analysis, primarily aim to reduce the number of predictor components (A) by summarizing the information contained in the original variables into fewer components. These components are designed to be independent (uncorrelated) (D) to avoid redundancy and multicollinearity, which improves model stability and interpretability.
Another important goal is to provide a framework for interpretability (C), helping analysts understand underlying patterns or latent structures in the data by transforming correlated variables into new independent components.
Statements (B) and (E) are incorrect in this context. Dimension reduction does not aim to increase the number of components (E), nor does it intend for the new components to be dependent (B). Instead, it seeks to capture most of the variance in fewer independent components.
Information Booster:
Dimension reduction methods leverage the correlation structure among predictor variables to simplify data while preserving essential information. For example, PCA creates new variables (principal components) that are linear combinations of the original variables, uncorrelated, and ordered by the amount of variance they explain. This helps:
Reduce dimensionality for computational efficiency
Avoid multicollinearity issues in regression and other models
Enhance interpretability by focusing on a few meaningful components
Facilitate visualization and pattern recognition in high-dimensional data
Additional Knowledge:
- B (To help ensure that these components are dependent): This is incorrect because dimension reduction methods specifically aim to make components independent or uncorrelated, to remove redundancy and simplify analysis.
- E (To increase the number of predictor components): This contradicts the core objective of dimension reduction, which is to reduce the number of variables/components, not increase them.