hamburger menu
All Coursesall course arrow
adda247
reward-icon
adda247
    arrow
    arrow
    arrow
    Given below are two statements: One is labelled as Assertion (A) and the other is labelled as Reason (R).​Assertion (A): If the securities with less t
    Question

    Given below are two statements: One is labelled as Assertion (A) and the other is labelled as Reason (R).

    Assertion (A): If the securities with less than perfect negative correlation between their price movements are combined, portfolio risk can be reduced significantly.
    Reason (R): The term with negative correlation has the effect of reducing the computed value of total portfolio risk, given other terms that are positive.

    In the light of the above statements, choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below:​

    A.

    Both (A) and (R) are correct and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)

    B.

    Both (A) and (R) are correct but (R) is NOT the correct explanation of (A)

    C.

    (A) is correct but (R) is incorrect

    D.

    (A) is incorrect but (R) is correct

    Correct option is A

    Both Assertion and Reason are correct, and the Reason (R) correctly explains Assertion (A).

    When two or more securities with less than perfect negative correlation (i.e., correlation < +1) are combined in a portfolio, their price movements do not move exactly in the same direction. This diversification effect leads to a reduction in overall portfolio risk, because the movement of one security may offset the movement of another.

    The Reason correctly supports the Assertion. In the portfolio variance formula, the correlation coefficient between securities plays a key role. If the correlation is negative, the covariance term becomes negative, which reduces the total variance (or risk) of the portfolio. Therefore, Reason (R) accurately explains why combining such assets reduces portfolio risk.

    Information Booster:

    • Portfolio diversification is most effective when the included assets are not perfectly positively correlated.

    • Even if the correlation is not fully negative (e.g., 0 or -0.5), risk reduction still occurs, though less than in the case of perfect negative correlation.

    • Perfect negative correlation (-1) is the ideal case for eliminating risk entirely for two-asset portfolios.

    • The correlation coefficient ranges from -1 to +1. Lower correlation implies better diversification.

    • The key to reducing portfolio risk lies in the interaction between asset returns, not just individual risk levels.

    • The impact of diversification is more visible in large portfolios where correlations between assets are carefully managed.

    Free Tests

    Free
    Must Attempt

    Basics of Education: Pedagogy, Andragogy, and Hutagogy

    languageIcon English
    • pdpQsnIcon10 Questions
    • pdpsheetsIcon20 Marks
    • timerIcon12 Mins
    languageIcon English
    Free
    Must Attempt

    UGC NET Paper 1 Mock Test 1

    languageIcon English
    • pdpQsnIcon50 Questions
    • pdpsheetsIcon100 Marks
    • timerIcon60 Mins
    languageIcon English
    Free
    Must Attempt

    Basics of Education: Pedagogy, Andragogy, and Hutagogy

    languageIcon English
    • pdpQsnIcon10 Questions
    • pdpsheetsIcon20 Marks
    • timerIcon12 Mins
    languageIcon English
    test-prime-package

    Access ‘UGC NET Management’ Mock Tests with

    • 60000+ Mocks and Previous Year Papers
    • Unlimited Re-Attempts
    • Personalised Report Card
    • 500% Refund on Final Selection
    • Largest Community
    students-icon
    354k+ students have already unlocked exclusive benefits with Test Prime!
    Our Plans
    Monthsup-arrow