Correct option is A
The Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) states that financial markets are “informationally efficient,” meaning that all available information is fully reflected in asset prices. In such markets:
A. Equilibrium rates of return will prevail: In an efficient market, prices adjust rapidly to new information. This leads to equilibrium where expected returns are consistent with the risk levels of securities.
D. Securities of listed firms sell at their fair values: According to EMH, all publicly available information is already incorporated into stock prices. Therefore, listed securities consistently trade close to their intrinsic value, preventing persistent under- or overvaluation.
Thus, statements A and D align with the core principles of efficient markets.
Information Booster:
Prices reflect all available information, so no investor can consistently outperform the market without taking extra risk.
Equilibrium returns exist where investors are compensated for risk taken, not due to superior information.
Fair value pricing ensures that arbitrage opportunities are minimal or non-existent.
EMH supports three forms: weak, semi-strong, and strong, depending on the information type reflected in prices.
Informed and uninformed investors both play roles in maintaining efficiency through trading activities.
Technical and fundamental analysis have limited usefulness in a truly efficient market.
Despite market anomalies, long-term trends often align with the efficient market assumptions.
Additional Knowledge:
B. Investor cannot earn a positive return: Investors can earn positive returns in an efficient market. What they cannot do consistently is earn abnormal returns (returns above the risk-adjusted expected rate) through prediction or market timing.
C. Volatility will be very high: Efficiency doesn't imply high volatility. Volatility depends on the flow of new information and investor reaction. While volatility may exist, it’s not a defining characteristic of market efficiency.
E. Investors are generally risk-averse: While this may be true in general finance theory, investor risk aversion is not a defining element of market efficiency. It is an assumption in utility theory or portfolio theory, but not a condition for EMH.


