Correct option is A
The
John Henry Effect occurs when participants in a control group work unusually hard because they are aware that they are being compared with an experimental group.
Basic information about the topic: The John Henry Effect (also known as compensatory rivalry) is an experimental bias and internal validity threat where control group members alter their behavior to overperform, competing directly with the experimental group.
Information Booster:
Explanation of the correct answer in pointers in detail
·
Compensatory Rivalry Mechanism: The
John Henry Effect manifests when control group subjects realize they are receiving a standard, baseline, or control treatment while an experimental group receives a novel intervention. This realization triggers a competitive drive, causing control members to
exert extraordinary effort to overcome the perceived disadvantage.
·
Origin of the Term: The phenomenon is named after
John Henry, a legendary 19th-century American steel driver who, upon learning his performance was being tested against a mechanical steam drill, worked himself to exhaustion to beat the machine.
·
Threat to Internal Validity: This effect threatens the internal validity of an experiment by
obscuring the true treatment effect. Because the control group artificially inflates its performance, the post-test results of both groups may show minimal difference, erroneously leading researchers to conclude that the experimental treatment was ineffective.
·
Mitigation Strategies: Educational researchers minimize the John Henry Effect by using
double-blind designs, keeping control participants unaware of the experimental group's activities, or ensuring equal motivational incentives across all study arms.
Additional Knowledge:
Explanation of the other options apart from the correct statements
·
When the test is too easy and many students achieve maximum or perfect score:
·
Why it is not correct: This psychometric outcome is known as the
Ceiling Effect, not the John Henry Effect.
· A
Ceiling Effect occurs when an assessment instrument lacks sufficient difficulty, causing scores to cluster at the upper limit and making it impossible to measure individual differences or growth at higher achievement levels.
·
The reactive effect of knowledge of participation in an experiment:
·
Why it is not correct: This general behavioral reaction is known as the
Hawthorne Effect.
· The
Hawthorne Effect refers to participants altering or improving their behavior simply because they know they are being observed in a study, regardless of whether a control vs. experimental comparison is taking place.
·
When the within groups variance becomes equal to the between-groups variance:
·
Why it is not correct: This describes a specific statistical condition in Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) where the
-ratio equals 1.0.
· When between-group variance equals within-group variance, it indicates that the treatment effect is no greater than random sampling error, leading to the
retention of the null hypothesis. It is a statistical metric, not a psychological reaction of control group participants.
Where