Correct option is D
Correct Matching:
- Arthapatti: Refers to the inference based on certain facts (A-III). In this case, "He does not eat in daytime; he is fat. He eats at night" implies the assumption that something is missing, like night eating causing weight gain.
- Abhava: Refers to absence or negation (B-II). The example “A chair is not a table” is a clear instance of negation, showing the difference between two objects.
- Upamana: Refers to analogy or comparison (C-IV). "This cow is different from a domestic cow; it must be a nilgai" is an analogy between the two types of cows.
- Sabda: Refers to verbal testimony or knowledge acquired through words (D-I). “Conchshell is not a bone according to Vedas” is an example of knowledge obtained through scripture or verbal testimony.
Information Booster:
- Arthapatti is a term used in Indian philosophy, especially in Nyaya and Vedanta, and refers to the inference made to explain an observation.
- Abhava is a concept in Indian logic that addresses the absence of something in particular.
- Upamana involves comparing two objects that share common characteristics to infer similarities, used in epistemology.
- Sabda is a type of pramana (valid means of knowledge) that denotes information gained through testimony, often used in Vedanta and Nyaya.
Additional Knowledge:
- These terms are part of the Indian philosophy of logic (Nyaya Shastra), which defines various methods through which knowledge can be acquired.
- These concepts have relevance in how reasoning and epistemology have developed in Indian schools of thought.