Correct option is B
Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are correct, but Reason (R) is not the correct explanation of Assertion (A). While Deendayal Upadhyay did indeed advocate Integral Humanism as a guiding philosophy for India, his rejection of Communism was more a part of his broader political and ideological critique of materialism rather than the foundation of Integral Humanism itself. His philosophy aimed at developing a society based on the synthesis of material and spiritual needs, while ensuring individual dignity and social welfare.
Key points that differentiate the two concepts:
· Integral Humanism focused on a holistic approach to human development that balances spiritual and material needs.
· Deendayal Upadhyay rejected both capitalism and communism because they failed to consider the spiritual dimension of humanity.
· Integral Humanism promotes the idea of society as an organic whole, not fragmented by excessive individualism or collectivism.
· Upadhyay's critique of Communism stemmed from its suppression of individual liberty, but this rejection is a part of his political thought, not the core of Integral Humanism.
Information Booster:
1. Integral Humanism was first articulated by Deendayal Upadhyay in 1965 as an alternative to Western ideologies.
2. It emphasizes the importance of 'Dharma' as a guiding principle for social organization.
3. Deendayal Upadhyay envisioned a decentralized economy with a focus on small-scale industries and rural development.
4. He rejected materialism and believed that both socialism and capitalism failed to address the spiritual needs of people.
5. Communism, according to Upadhyay, suppressed individualism for collective power, which he found problematic.
6. The concept encourages self-reliance and the integration of economic, social, and cultural development.