arrow
arrow
arrow
Arrange the following Cases related to Indian Constitution in the chronological order:  A. The Golknath Case  B. The Kesavananda Bhara
Question



Arrange the following Cases related to Indian Constitution in the chronological order: 
A. The Golknath Case 
B. The Kesavananda Bharati Case 
C. The Minerva Mills Case 
D. The A. K. Gopalan Case 
E. The Indra Sawhney Case 
Choose the correct answer from the options given below:

A.

A, B, C, D, E

B.

D, A, B, C, E

C.

E, A, B, D, C

D.

E, C, D, B, A

Correct option is B


The correct chronological order is:
1. The A. K. Gopalan Case (D) – 1950: This case was one of the earliest constitutional cases in India and dealt with the interpretation of personal liberty under Article 21.
2. The Golaknath Case (A) – 1967: In this landmark case, the Supreme Court ruled that Parliament cannot amend the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution.
3. The Kesavananda Bharati Case (B) – 1973: The Supreme Court established the Basic Structure Doctrine, limiting the Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution.
4. The Minerva Mills Case (C) – 1980: This case reaffirmed the Basic Structure Doctrine and struck down certain amendments to the Constitution, ensuring that judicial review remained part of the basic structure.
5. The Indra Sawhney Case (E) – 1992: This case dealt with reservations in government jobs and educational institutions, upholding the 27% quota for Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and defining the limits of affirmative action.
Information Booster:
1. A. K. Gopalan Case (1950): The Court adopted a narrow interpretation of personal liberty under Article 21 and upheld preventive detention.
2. Golaknath Case (1967): The Supreme Court held that fundamental rights cannot be amended by Parliament under Article 368.
3. Kesavananda Bharati Case (1973): This case gave birth to the Basic Structure Doctrine, which limits the powers of Parliament to alter the Constitution.
4. Minerva Mills Case (1980): Reinforced the Basic Structure Doctrine, emphasizing that judicial review is an essential feature of the Constitution.
5. Indra Sawhney Case (1992): Defined the limits of reservation policies, ruling that reservations should not exceed 50%, and introduced the concept of creamy layer for OBCs.

Free Tests

Free
Must Attempt

Basics of Education: Pedagogy, Andragogy, and Hutagogy

languageIcon English
  • pdpQsnIcon10 Questions
  • pdpsheetsIcon20 Marks
  • timerIcon12 Mins
languageIcon English
Free
Must Attempt

UGC NET Paper 1 Mock Test 1

languageIcon English
  • pdpQsnIcon50 Questions
  • pdpsheetsIcon100 Marks
  • timerIcon60 Mins
languageIcon English
Free
Must Attempt

Basics of Education: Pedagogy, Andragogy, and Hutagogy

languageIcon English
  • pdpQsnIcon10 Questions
  • pdpsheetsIcon20 Marks
  • timerIcon12 Mins
languageIcon English

Similar Questions

test-prime-package

Access ‘UGC NET December’ Mock Tests with

  • 60000+ Mocks and Previous Year Papers
  • Unlimited Re-Attempts
  • Personalised Report Card
  • 500% Refund on Final Selection
  • Largest Community
students-icon
353k+ students have already unlocked exclusive benefits with Test Prime!
Our Plans
Monthsup-arrow