The case of Vardhaman Kaushik v/s Union of India decided in 2014–15 is considered unique in the context of resolving the menace of air pollution in Delhi because:
(A) The National Green Tribunal rejected the petition for want of locus standi for the petitioner (B) The National Green Tribunal adopted the pragmatic "consultative and deliberated" approach in this case (C) The National Green Tribunal rejected the petition for want of jurisdiction in the matter (D) The National Green Tribunal permitted the burning of crop remnant in agricultural fields falling in NCR Delhi
Choose the correct answer from the options given below:

Correct option is C

In Vardhaman Kaushik v. Union of India (2014–15), the National Green Tribunal (NGT) dealt with the issue of severe air pollution in Delhi. The NGT adopted a pragmatic, consultative, and deliberated approach to tackle pollution, rather than rejecting the petition on technical grounds. The tribunal issued several directives such as controlling vehicle emissions, construction dust, and crop burning. Hence, (B) only is correct.