arrow
arrow
arrow
In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court hold that “the federalism in India is not a matter of administrative convenience, but one of pri
Question

In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court hold that “the federalism in India is not a matter of administrative convenience, but one of principle”?

A.

S. R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994)

B.

Raja Ram Pal v. Hon’ble Speaker, Lok Sabha (2007)

C.

Madras Bar Association v. Union of India (2014)

D.

State of West Bengal v. Committee for Protection of Democratic Rights (2010)

Correct option is A


In S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994), the Supreme Court delivered a landmark judgment on Centre-State relations, stating that Indian federalism is not merely administrative but a matter of constitutional principle. The case dealt with the misuse of Article 356 (President’s Rule) and emphasized the basic structure doctrine, under which federalism is held to be an inviolable feature.
Information Booster:
· The judgment introduced judicial review of President’s Rule.
· Reinforced that States are not mere departments of the Centre.

Free Tests

Free
Must Attempt

Basics of Education: Pedagogy, Andragogy, and Hutagogy

languageIcon English
  • pdpQsnIcon10 Questions
  • pdpsheetsIcon20 Marks
  • timerIcon12 Mins
languageIcon English
Free
Must Attempt

UGC NET Paper 1 Mock Test 1

languageIcon English
  • pdpQsnIcon50 Questions
  • pdpsheetsIcon100 Marks
  • timerIcon60 Mins
languageIcon English
Free
Must Attempt

Basics of Education: Pedagogy, Andragogy, and Hutagogy

languageIcon English
  • pdpQsnIcon10 Questions
  • pdpsheetsIcon20 Marks
  • timerIcon12 Mins
languageIcon English

Similar Questions

test-prime-package

Access ‘UGC NET LAW’ Mock Tests with

  • 60000+ Mocks and Previous Year Papers
  • Unlimited Re-Attempts
  • Personalised Report Card
  • 500% Refund on Final Selection
  • Largest Community
students-icon
354k+ students have already unlocked exclusive benefits with Test Prime!
Our Plans
Monthsup-arrow