Read the given question and decide which of the following arguments is/are strong.
Statement:
Should officers of nationalised banks be transferred after 1 or 2 years?
Arguments:
I. Yes. They get friendly with local people and are manipulated by them.
II. No. By the time their policies and schemes start taking shape, they have to leave.
III. No. This will create a lot of administrative hassles and cause a lot of inconvenience to the officers.

Statement:
Should officers of nationalised banks be transferred after 1 or 2 years?

According to given information:
Arguments:
I. Yes. They get friendly with local people and are manipulated by them.

This assumption generalizes that officers will always form harmful relationships and implies distrust in their professionalism. It is not a strong argument as it lacks logical reasoning and concrete evidence. Not a strong argument.
II. No. By the time their policies and schemes start taking shape, they have to leave.

This is a strong argument, as frequent transfers could disrupt the implementation of policies and long-term plans. It highlights a valid concern regarding inefficiency caused by short tenures. Strong argument.
III. No. This will create a lot of administrative hassles and cause a lot of inconvenience to the officers.

This is also a strong argument as it addresses the practical and logistical challenges that frequent transfers would impose on the officers and the administration. Strong argument.

Thus, the correct option is (c) Only arguments II and III are strong.