A question is given, followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are valid with respect to the question.

Question:

Should school-going children have internet access at home?

Arguments:

(I): Yes, because through the internet students can have access to educational videos on YouTube, articles addressing current events that impact their lives, and online tests or quizzes required in their coursework.

(II): No, it’s a waste of time.​​

Should school-going children have internet access at home?

(I): Yes, because through the internet students can have access to educational videos on YouTube, articles addressing current events that impact their lives, and online tests or quizzes required in their coursework.

→ This is a strong, logical, positive argument based on educational benefits

(II): No, it’s a waste of time.​​

→ This is a weak argument because it's a sweeping negative statement without reasoning or support (Invalid).

So, only Argument (I) is valid.

Thus, the correct option is: (a)