In the question given below statement is followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument :

Statement: Should a cricket team have more than one captain during a match ?

Arguments:
(I) No, one needs to make decisions on the spot and there won't be time to resolve conflicting ideas between the captains on the field if such a scenario emerges.
(II) Yes, it is always better to have more brains coming to an understanding before taking a decision.

Statement: Should a cricket team have more than one captain during a match ?

Arguments:
(I) No, one needs to make decisions on the spot and there won't be time to resolve conflicting ideas between the captains on the field if such a scenario emerges.

This is a strong argument because cricket often requires quick, decisive actions during matches. Multiple captains could cause confusion or delays, which can negatively impact the team’s performance. The argument is practical and relevant to the context of a cricket match.
(II) Yes, it is always better to have more brains coming to an understanding before taking a decision.

This is a weak argument. Having two captains won't help save time but will lead to dispute and conflicting ideas between the captains on the field if such a scenario emerges.

So, If only I is strong.

Thus, the correct answer is (c).