Correct option is D
Duty to Register FIR (A - 1: Rajinder Singh Katoch vs. Chandigarh Administration and others): In this case, the Supreme Court emphasized that police officers are legally obliged to register an FIR upon receiving information about a cognizable offense. The failure to do so constitutes a violation of the complainant's rights, as it obstructs the path to justice.
Laches in Investigation (B - 2: Krishnegowda vs. State of Karnataka): This case addressed the issue of delays or laches in the investigation process. The court ruled that such delays could undermine the fairness of the legal process and violate the accused's right to a speedy trial. Prompt investigation is crucial to ensuring that justice is served.
Faulty Investigation (C - 3: Saidu Mohammed vs. State of Kerala): In this case, the court dealt with the consequences of a flawed or faulty investigation. It was determined that improper investigation procedures could lead to a miscarriage of justice. The case highlighted the need for adherence to proper investigative protocols to protect the rights of all parties involved.
Delay in Examination of Witnesses (D - 4: Surjit Sarkar vs. State of West Bengal): This case focused on the detrimental effects of delays in examining witnesses. The court noted that such delays could impair the reliability of witness testimony and negatively impact the overall fairness of the trial. Timely examination of witnesses is essential to maintaining the integrity of the judicial process.
