Yashpal Committee Report (2009) advocated for:
A. Proliferation of deemed universities
B. Promoting privatisation of Higher Education
C. Curriculum Reforms
D. Full-fledged University status to IIT and IIM
E. Establishing National Commission for Higher Education
Choose the correct answer from the options given below:

Correct option is C

The correct answer is (c) "C, D and E only."
Explanation: The Yashpal Committee Report (2009) primarily focused on various aspects of higher education reforms in India. Key recommendations included curriculum reforms to make education more relevant and comprehensive, granting full-fledged university status to premier institutions like IITs and IIMs, and establishing a National Commission for Higher Education to oversee these reforms. However, the proliferation of deemed universities and promoting privatization of higher education were not among its main objectives.
Information Booster:
1. Yashpal Committee: Set up to review and suggest reforms in higher education, it emphasized reducing the burden on students and improving the quality of education.
2. Curriculum Reforms: The committee advocated for a more holistic and integrated curriculum, moving away from rote learning to foster critical thinking and creativity.
3. University Status to IITs and IIMs: The report recommended that these institutes, known for their excellence, should be given full-fledged university status to enhance their role in education and research.
4. National Commission for Higher Education: A proposed apex body to regulate and monitor higher education institutions, ensuring quality and accountability.
5. Critique of Deemed Universities: The committee was concerned about the uncontrolled growth of deemed universities, many of which were criticized for poor academic standards.
6. Focus on Public Good: The report stressed that higher education should serve the public good rather than being driven by market forces.
Additional Information:
· Proliferation of Deemed Universities: The Yashpal Committee actually highlighted the risks associated with the unchecked growth of deemed universities, noting that many failed to meet the required standards of education.
· Privatization of Higher Education: The committee was cautious about privatization, warning that it could lead to inequities and undermine the public purpose of education.
· National Commission for Higher Education: The establishment of this body was intended to streamline higher education governance and ensure that academic standards are upheld across institutions.
Key Points:
· The Yashpal Committee’s recommendations were pivotal in shaping modern higher education policies in India.
· Its focus was on quality, inclusiveness, and reducing the burden on students.
· The committee’s emphasis on regulatory oversight sought to protect the public interest in higher education.