Correct option is C
The correct answer is
(c) Section 67. Section 67 of the Indian Penal Code (I.P.C.) specifically addresses the situation where an offence is punishable only with a fine, and the offender fails to pay the fine. In such cases, the Court may sentence the offender to imprisonment in lieu of the fine.
Explanation:
·
Section 67 I.P.C.: This Section provides that when an offence is punishable with a fine only, and the offender fails to pay the fine, the Court may impose imprisonment for a period that corresponds to the amount of the fine. The length of imprisonment depends on the amount of the fine and is subject to the limits specified in the Section.
Information Booster:
1.
Imprisonment in Default: Section 67 allows the Court to impose imprisonment when the offender fails to pay a fine. The imprisonment serves as an alternative punishment.
2.
Duration of Imprisonment: The duration of imprisonment under Section 67 is proportionate to the fine amount, with specified limits depending on the size of the fine.
3.
Fine Only Offences: This Section applies to offences that are punishable solely by a fine, meaning no other form of punishment (like imprisonment or community service) is prescribed.
4.
Sections 63 & 64 I.P.C.: These Sections deal with the imposition of fines (Section 63) and the ability of Courts to impose both imprisonment and fine (Section 64), but neither specifically addresses imprisonment in lieu of non-payment of fines for offences punishable by fine only.
5.
Purpose: The provision ensures that offenders cannot evade punishment by simply refusing to pay a fine when no other punishment is prescribed.
Additional Information:
·
Section 63 (a): Relates to the amount of the fine that can be imposed under the I.P.C., stating that it should be unlimited but not excessive.
·
Section 64 (b): Deals with cases where an offence is punishable with both imprisonment and fine, allowing Courts to impose both or either.
·
None of the Above (d): Incorrect, as Section 67 is the correct provision.
