Which ones are true about the Passive Resistance and Satyagraha?
A. Passive Resistance is equivalent to Satyagraha.
B. Passive Resistance is not afraid of the physical strength while Satyagraha is afraid of physical strength.
C. Passive Resistance is negative in practice whereas Satyagraha is positive morality.
D. Passive Resistance is weapon of the weaker sections, Satyagraha never desires to terrorise the opponent.
Choose the  correct answer from the options given below:

Correct option is C

The correct statements are C and D.
· Statement C is correct because Passive Resistance is often negative in practice, meaning it involves merely resisting or non-cooperating without necessarily striving for a positive moral transformation. In contrast, Satyagraha, as propounded by Mahatma Gandhi, is based on positive morality, focusing on the transformation of both the oppressor and the oppressed through truth and non-violence.
· Statement D is also correct because Passive Resistance has often been seen as a tactic used by weaker sections of society against more powerful oppressors. In contrast, Satyagraha aims not to coerce or terrorize the opponent but rather to appeal to their sense of justice and humanity, seeking a moral victory.
Information Booster:
1. Satyagraha was developed by Mahatma Gandhi and is rooted in non-violence (Ahimsa) and truth (Satya).
2. Passive Resistance, unlike Satyagraha, can be more about obstruction and opposition without necessarily embodying non-violence or moral truth.
3. Satyagraha focuses on converting the wrongdoer, fostering understanding, and appealing to the opponent's conscience.
4. Passive Resistance is seen as more pragmatic, often used in political struggles where non-violence is not a strict principle.
5. The success of Satyagraha lies in the self-discipline and moral strength of the practitioner, not the weakness or fear of the opponent's power.
6. Satyagraha was a pivotal method during India's freedom struggle, influencing civil rights movements globally.