Correct option is B
Aristotelian syllogism is deductive (A): This statement is true. Aristotelian syllogism follows deductive reasoning where a specific conclusion logically follows from general premises. For example, if all men are mortal and Socrates is a man, then Socrates is mortal.
Nyāya syllogism is deductive (B): This statement is true. The Nyāya system of logic uses a structured deductive method to reach conclusions. It follows a five-step framework: proposition, reason, example, application, and conclusion.
Aristotelian syllogism is formal (C): This statement is true. Aristotelian syllogism relies on a formal structure of argument, where the conclusion's validity depends on the logical form rather than the content.
Nyāya syllogism is formal (D): This statement is true. The Nyāya syllogism employs a systematic, step-by-step process that adheres to formal logical structures, making it formal in its presentation.
Nyāya syllogism is inductive (E): This statement is true. The Nyāya system also incorporates inductive reasoning, particularly through the use of examples and observations to generalize conclusions.
Information Booster 1. Deductive Reasoning: Moves from general principles to specific conclusions. Example: All humans are mortal; John is a human, so John is mortal.
2. Inductive Reasoning: Draws general conclusions based on specific observations. Example: Every swan observed so far is white; therefore, all swans are white.
3. Aristotelian Syllogism: Consists of three parts:
· Major premise
· Minor premise
· Conclusion
4. Nyāya Syllogism: Comprises five steps:
· Pratijna (Proposition)
· Hetu (Reason)
· Udaharana (Example)
· Upanaya (Application)
· Nigmana (Conclusion)
5. Formal Logic: Emphasizes the structure of arguments, ensuring conclusions follow logically from premises.
6. Indian Logic: Combines deductive and inductive reasoning, often integrating real-world examples.