Which of the following statements are correct with regard to the recent Supreme Court Judgement on Right to Privacy? (A) Right to Privacy is declared as an intrinsic part of Article 21 that protects life and liberty. (B) 10 Judge Bench of the Supreme Court delivered this historic judgement. (C) The judgement was delivered by the Bench headed by Chief Justice of India J.S. Khehar. (D) The Government has argued that the Constitution does not guarantee individual privacy as an inalienable Fundamental Right.
Select the correct answer using the code given below –

Correct option is A

The Supreme Court of India's landmark judgment on the Right to Privacy was delivered on August 24, 2017, in the case of Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) vs. Union of India. This unanimous decision by a nine-judge bench recognized the right to privacy as a fundamental right under the Indian Constitution.
Statement (A): The right to Privacy is declared as an intrinsic part of Article 21 that protects life and liberty.
• The Court held that the right to privacy is an intrinsic part of the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution.
Statement (B): 10 Judge Bench of the Supreme Court delivered this historic judgment.
• The judgment was delivered by a nine-judge bench, not a ten-judge bench.
Statement (C): The judgment was delivered by the Bench headed by Chief Justice of India J.S. Khehar.
• The nine-judge bench was headed by Chief Justice J.S. Khehar.
Statement (D): The Government has argued that the Constitution does not guarantee individual privacy as an inalienable Fundamental Right.
• The Union Government contended that the Constitution does not guarantee individual privacy as an inalienable fundamental right.
Information Booster:
•Historical Context: Before this judgment, the Supreme Court had delivered conflicting opinions on the right to privacy. In M.P. Sharma v. Satish Chandra (1954), an eight-judge bench held that the right to privacy is not a fundamental right. Similarly, in Kharak Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh (1964), a six-judge bench reached a similar conclusion. However, over time, the Court's stance evolved, leading to the landmark 2017 judgment.
•Implications of the Judgment: This ruling has far-reaching implications, particularly concerning the Aadhaar scheme. The Court held that the right to privacy is protected under Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution, thereby impacting the implementation of Aadhaar and other surveillance measures.
•Future Developments: The recognition of the right to privacy as a fundamental right has paved the way for subsequent judgments, including the decriminalization of homosexuality in Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018) and the decriminalization of adultery in Joseph Shine v. Union of India (2018).
Additional Knowledge:
• Right to Privacy is declared as an intrinsic part of Article 21 that protects life and liberty.
o The Supreme Court affirmed that the right to privacy is an intrinsic part of the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21.
•10 Judge Bench of the Supreme Court delivered this historic judgment.
oThe judgment was delivered by a nine-judge bench, not a ten-judge bench.
•The judgment was delivered by the Bench headed by Chief Justice of India J.S. Khehar.
oThe nine-judge bench was headed by Chief Justice J.S. Khehar.
•The Government has argued that the Constitution does not guarantee individual privacy as an inalienable Fundamental Right.
oThe Union Government contended that the Constitution does not guarantee individual privacy as an inalienable fundamental right.