Correct option is B
The correct answer is
(b) False Cause. This fallacy arises from defective induction, which refers to situations where conclusions are drawn based on insufficient or flawed evidence. In the
False Cause fallacy, a causal connection is incorrectly inferred based on weak or coincidental evidence. For example, believing that because Event A happened before Event B, Event A must have caused Event B.
Information Booster
Types of Defective Induction Fallacies 1.
False Cause: Assuming a causal relationship without sufficient evidence (e.g., "Since the rooster crows before sunrise, the rooster causes the sun to rise").
2.
Hasty Generalization: Drawing a broad conclusion from a small or non-representative sample.
3.
Weak Analogy: Comparing two things that are not sufficiently similar to support the conclusion.
Additional knowledge
·
Fallacy of Composition: This fallacy occurs when someone assumes that what is true for the parts must also be true for the whole. It is a fallacy of
presumption rather than defective induction.
·
Begging the Question: This fallacy involves assuming the conclusion within the premises, essentially arguing in a circle. It is a fallacy of
presumption or
circular reasoning, not related to defective induction.
·
Irrelevant Conclusion (Ignoratio Elenchi): This fallacy occurs when an argument is made that may be logically valid but does not address the issue in question. It is a fallacy of
relevance, not defective induction.