Correct option is B
The case of Mahabub Shah v. Emperor (1945) specifically distinguishes between common intention (a shared intention to commit a criminal act) and similar intention (separate but coinciding intentions).
Which among the following makes a distinction between common intention and similar intention?
A. Mahabub Shah v. Emperor (1945)
B. Barendra Kumar Ghosh v. Emperor (1925)
C. Jagmohan Singh v. State of UP (1973)
D.Balwant Singh v. State of Punjab (1995)
The case of Mahabub Shah v. Emperor (1945) specifically distinguishes between common intention (a shared intention to commit a criminal act) and similar intention (separate but coinciding intentions).
| (A) Fighting by two or more persons in public place |
[i] Abetment |
| (B) Intentional aiding in commission of an offence |
[ii] Sedition |
| (C) Violence is caused by five or more persons |
[iii] Affray |
| (D) Offence committed against state by words, signs or visible representation |
[iv] Riot |
To constitute the offence of kidnapping from lawful guardianship under Section 361 (137 BNS) of Indian Penal Code the age of the minor should be:
(A) Under eighteen years if male
(B) Under sixteen years if male
(C) Under eighteen years if female
(D) Under sixteen years if female
Choose the correct option:
Arrange the following judgments of the Supreme Court on the issue of constitutionality of death penalty in chronological order:
(A) Rajendra Prasad v State of U.P.
(B) Machhi Singh v State of Rajasthan
(C) Jagmohan Singh v State of U.P.
(D) Bachan Singh v State of Punjab
Choose the correct option:
| List I |
List II |
| (A) Section 80 |
[i] Act done by person justified or by mistake of fact believing himself justified by law |
| (B) Section 82 |
[ii] Act of a child above seven and under twelve of immature understanding |
| (C) Section 83 |
[iii] Act of a child under seven years of age |
| (D) Section 79 |
[iv] Accident in doing a lawful act |
Suggested Test Series
Suggested Test Series