Correct option is A
The correct answer is (a) Cancelled the land allotment due to lack of public benefit assessment.
Explanation:
• The Supreme Court upheld the cancellation of the 125-acre land allotted to the Kamla Nehru Memorial Trust (KNMT) by UPSIDC.
• The Court found that the Trust was a chronic defaulter that failed to make payments and did not execute the lease deed despite repeated notices.
• It noted that the 2003 allotment was made without competitive bidding and lacked assessment of public benefit.
• The Court held that the allotment violated the Public Trust Doctrine, which mandates fair and transparent allocation of public resources.
• The Court ordered that future land allotments must ensure transparency, revenue maximization, and promotion of public interest.
Information Booster:
• The Public Trust Doctrine ensures that the State acts as a trustee of natural and public resources.
• The doctrine restricts arbitrary allotment of land, ensuring fairness and accountability.
Additional Knowledge:
Directed the state to provide alternative land (Option b)
• The Court did not order any alternative land to be given to the Trust.
• Instead, it reaffirmed the cancellation.
Ordered compensation to the Trust (Option c)
• No compensation was ordered as the Trust had defaulted on payment obligations.
Upheld the land allotment due to considerable public benefit (Option d)
• The Court ruled the opposite, citing lack of public benefit assessment.
• It also annulled any subsequent allotment made to M/s Jagdishpur Paper Mills Ltd.