Correct option is D
The Correct answer is (d) It primarily benefited large landowners, increasing economic disparities.
Explanation:
A major criticism of the Green Revolution in India was that it disproportionately benefited large landowners, who had better access to the technology, credit, and resources needed for high-input farming (such as improved seeds, fertilizers, and irrigation). This led to an increase in economic disparities, as smaller farmers, especially those without adequate resources, were left behind and could not fully participate in the revolution's gains.
Information Booster:
The Green Revolution led to a significant increase in agricultural productivity in India, especially in wheat and rice production.
However, the benefits were not equally distributed, and small farmers faced challenges in adopting the new techniques.
The use of high-yielding varieties of crops, along with heavy reliance on chemical fertilizers and pesticides, led to ecological concerns.
Wealthier landowners, who had access to capital and irrigation facilities, reaped the greatest rewards from the Green Revolution.
The rise in economic inequality between large and small landowners became a prominent issue, as smaller farmers found themselves further marginalized.
The Green Revolution, while improving food security, also contributed to social unrest in rural areas, with calls for better distribution of agricultural benefits.
Additional Information:
It focused on non-irrigated regions The Green Revolution largely focused on irrigated regions, where high-yielding crops could thrive with proper irrigation.
It solved micronutrient deficiencies among the poor : The Green Revolution mainly focused on increasing the quantity of food, not addressing micronutrient deficiencies.
It benefited all farmers equally: Explained, the Green Revolution primarily benefited larger landowners who had the resources to adopt new technologies.
English
100 Questions
100 Marks
90 Mins
