Three statements are followed by four conclusions numbered 1, IL IIT and IV. You have to consider these statements to be true, even if they seem at variance from commonly known facts. Decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the given statements.
Statements:
1. All peacocks are ducks.
2. No duck is a kite.
3. All fowls are kites.
Conclusions:
I. Some fowls are peacocks.
II. No kite is a peacock.
III. No peacock is a fowl.
IV. Some kites are peacocks.

​Statements:
1. All peacocks are ducks.
2. No duck is a kite.
3. All fowls are kites.

​Conclusions:
I. Some fowls are peacocks. (False, there is no direct or indirect relation between fowls and peacocks).
II. No kite is a peacock. (True, all peacocks are ducks and no duck is a kite, so that means no kite is a peacock).
III. No peacock is a fowl. (True, all peacocks are ducks, no duck is a kite and all fowls are kties, so that means no peacock is a fowl).
IV. Some kites are peacocks. (False, there is no direct or indirect relation between kites and peacocks).

So, ​Only conclusions II and III follows.

Thus, correct options is (b).