Given below are two statements:

Statement I: According to Nyaya philosophy an argument does not proceed on the issues that are well established.
Statement II: According to Nyaya philosophy an argument can proceed only on those issues that are completely and absolutely unknown.
In the light of the above statements, choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below:

Correct option is C

According to Nyaya philosophy, arguments are not needed for issues that are already well-established because they are considered settled truths. Therefore, Statement I is correct. However, Statement II is incorrect because Nyaya does not argue about issues that are completely unknown or unknowable. Instead, arguments proceed on issues that are debatable or controversial, meaning that they are neither well-established nor entirely unknown.
Information Booster: 1. Nyaya philosophy: Focuses on valid knowledge (Prama) and methods of gaining knowledge (Pramana). Nyaya philosophy is deeply rooted in logical debate and focuses on issues where reasoning can clarify or resolve uncertainty.
2. Established truths do not require further debate according to Nyaya since they are already accepted.
3. Nyaya does not concern itself with entirely unknown topics because there’s no foundation for logical debate in such cases.
4. The Nyaya Sutras emphasize logical discourse based on probable knowledge.
5. Argumentation: According to Nyaya, arguments are essential when a topic is under dispute or when some evidence exists but is insufficient for a definitive conclusion.
6. Epistemology: Nyaya’s contribution to epistemology is significant, particularly through its rigorous analysis of perception, inference, comparison, and testimony.