Correct option is C
The case of
Satyabrata Ghose v. Mangiram Bongur is a landmark case on the doctrine of
frustration of contract under
Section 56 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. It addresses what happens when an unforeseen event makes performance impossible.
Information Booster: The doctrine of frustration discharges parties from their contractual obligations when an unforeseen event renders performance impossible or radically changes the contract's nature.
Additional Knowledge:
·
(a) Minor's contract: Incorrect, the case deals with frustration, not minors.
·
(b) Consideration: Incorrect, this case does not deal with consideration.
·
(d) Contingent contract: Incorrect, though related, the case specifically deals with frustration.
