Correct option is A
The Responsive Model of Curriculum Evaluation was developed by
Robert Stake in 1973.
Information Booster:
· Focus on Stakeholder Concerns: Stake’s Responsive Model prioritizes the direct needs, concerns, and real-time reactions of stakeholders (students, teachers, parents, and community members) rather than relying strictly on pre-determined objectives.
· Naturalistic and Qualitative Approach: It relies heavily on qualitative data collection methods—such as observations, interviews, and open-ended discussions—to capture the full reality of how a program functions in practice.
· Continuous Feedback Loop: The evaluation process is iterative and flexible, meaning the evaluator continuously adapts assessment questions and focus areas based on ongoing classroom interactions and participant responses.
· Context-Oriented Evaluation: It emphasizes evaluating curriculum within its natural social and educational context, rendering it highly effective for assessing complex human experiences rather than measuring standardized outcomes alone.
Additional Knowledge:
· Scriven: Michael Scriven is renowned for introducing the fundamental distinction between Formative and Summative Evaluation (1967), as well as developing the Goal-Free Evaluation Model, which assesses a program's actual outcomes rather than focusing on its intended objectives.
· Tyler: Ralph Tyler developed the classical Objectives-Centered Model (or Tyler’s Behavioral Model), which focuses strictly on measuring the extent to which pre-stated educational objectives have been achieved through structured learning experiences.
· Kirkpatrick: Donald Kirkpatrick conceptualized the Four-Level Training Evaluation Model (Reaction, Learning, Behavior, and Results), which is primarily used to evaluate corporate training and vocational skill programs rather than general curriculum responsiveness.
Information Booster:
· Focus on Stakeholder Concerns: Stake’s Responsive Model prioritizes the direct needs, concerns, and real-time reactions of stakeholders (students, teachers, parents, and community members) rather than relying strictly on pre-determined objectives.
· Naturalistic and Qualitative Approach: It relies heavily on qualitative data collection methods—such as observations, interviews, and open-ended discussions—to capture the full reality of how a program functions in practice.
· Continuous Feedback Loop: The evaluation process is iterative and flexible, meaning the evaluator continuously adapts assessment questions and focus areas based on ongoing classroom interactions and participant responses.
· Context-Oriented Evaluation: It emphasizes evaluating curriculum within its natural social and educational context, rendering it highly effective for assessing complex human experiences rather than measuring standardized outcomes alone.
Additional Knowledge:
· Scriven: Michael Scriven is renowned for introducing the fundamental distinction between Formative and Summative Evaluation (1967), as well as developing the Goal-Free Evaluation Model, which assesses a program's actual outcomes rather than focusing on its intended objectives.
· Tyler: Ralph Tyler developed the classical Objectives-Centered Model (or Tyler’s Behavioral Model), which focuses strictly on measuring the extent to which pre-stated educational objectives have been achieved through structured learning experiences.
· Kirkpatrick: Donald Kirkpatrick conceptualized the Four-Level Training Evaluation Model (Reaction, Learning, Behavior, and Results), which is primarily used to evaluate corporate training and vocational skill programs rather than general curriculum responsiveness.