Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the statements.

Statements:

I. All ovals are bins.

II. No bin is a car.

III. No bin is a plum.

Conclusions:

(I) No oval is a car.

(II) Some plums are cars.

I. All ovals are bins.

II. No bin is a car.

III. No bin is a plum.

Let's analyze the conclusions:

Conclusion (I): No oval is a car. (True) - From the Venn diagram, it is evident that all ovals are bins and no bin is a car. o, from this, it can be concluded that no oval is a car. Thus, this conclusion follows.

Conclusion (II): Some plums are cars.  (False) - From the Venn diagram, it is evident that there is no direct relation between plums and cars. So, no definite relation can be drawn. Thus, this conclusion does not follow.

So, only conclusion (I) follows.

Thus, the correct answer is (d).