Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.

Statements:
I. All rectangles are trapezium.
II. All trapeziums are parallelogram.
III. No parallelogram is circle.
Conclusions:
I) No rectangle is circle.
II) No trapezium is circle.
III) All rectangles are parallelogram.

​Statements:
I. All rectangles are trapezium.
II. All trapeziums are parallelogram.
III. No parallelogram is circle.

​Conclusions:

I) No rectangle is circle. (Follows, since rectangles are a subset of parallelograms, they cannot be circles either.)
II) No trapezium is circle. (Follows, So trapeziums, being a kind of parallelogram, cannot be circles)​

III) All rectangles are parallelogram. (Follows, Trapezium ⊆ Parallelogram So by transitive logic: Rectangle ⊆ Parallelogram )​