Correct option is B
Varenius was the scholar who laid the foundation for the dichotomy of Systematic vs. Regional Geography. In his work "Geographia Generalis" (1650), he differentiated between the two branches of geography: Systematic Geography, which focuses on the study of geographic phenomena in a general context (e.g., climate, population, or vegetation), and Regional Geography, which focuses on specific geographic areas or regions, considering the unique characteristics of those places.
Information Booster:
- Systematic Geography deals with broad patterns and processes, such as the study of climate, landforms, and vegetation types on a global scale.
- Regional Geography focuses on the unique characteristics of specific regions or areas, considering how physical, cultural, and economic factors come together to shape a region.
- Varenius' work had a significant influence on the development of modern geography by establishing the basic framework for geographers to classify and analyze different geographical phenomena.
- The dichotomy created by Varenius shaped the way geography is taught and understood today, with some geographers focusing on global patterns (systematic geography) and others on specific places or regions (regional geography).
- Varenius’ ideas were essential in shaping geographic methods and laid the groundwork for future geographers to explore both local and global geographic phenomena.
Additional Knowledge:
Cook (a): While Cook was a renowned explorer, particularly famous for his voyages to the Pacific Ocean, he did not contribute to the theoretical foundation of systematic and regional geography. His work primarily focused on exploration and mapping.
Kant (c): Immanuel Kant, primarily known for his work in philosophy, did not contribute directly to the dichotomy of systematic vs. regional geography. His philosophical ideas did, however, influence the development of other fields of knowledge, including geography.
Darwin (d): Charles Darwin, famous for his theory of evolution, contributed significantly to the biological sciences. Although his work on natural selection influenced geographical studies in terms of understanding biodiversity, he did not lay the foundation for the systematic vs. regional geography debate.