Given below are two statements:
Statement I: The poststructuralists' genre critics suggest that the way to 'de-essentialize’ genre is to re cast it in terms of discourse
Statement II: But while the poststructuralist move toward dialectical exchange and ideology is both useful and necessary, conceiving of genre primarily in terms of discourse reveals certain limitations that are intrinsic to poststructuralism's basic approach to discourse and to the relationship envisioned between discourse and subjectivity.
In light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options given below:

Correct option is B

Statement I is false because poststructuralist genre critics do not suggest that the way to "de-essentialize" genre is to recast it in terms of discourse. In fact, many poststructuralist genre critics have argued that discourse is too broad and amorphous a concept to be useful in understanding genre. They have also argued that discourse is often used to reinforce dominant ideologies, which is the opposite of what they are trying to do when they de-essentialize genre.
Statement II is false because poststructuralist genre critics do not conceive of genre primarily in terms of discourse. They see genre as a complex system of conventions and practices that are embedded in social and cultural institutions. They also recognize that genre is constantly evolving and changing, and that it can be used to express a wide range of viewpoints and ideologies.
Some specific examples of how poststructuralist genre critics have challenged the traditional essentialist view of genre:
· They have shown that genre boundaries are often fluid and permeable, and that texts can belong to multiple genres at the same time.
· They have argued that genre is not simply a matter of form, but also of content and ideology.
· They have examined how genre is used to construct and maintain social and cultural identities.
Poststructuralist genre critics have made significant contributions to our understanding of genre, and their work has helped to break down the traditional essentialist view of genre.
Some specific examples of how poststructuralist genre critics have used their approach to discourse to challenge the traditional essentialist view of genre:
· They have shown that genre discourse is often used to naturalize and legitimize certain genres, while marginalizing and de-legitimizing others.
· They have examined how genre discourse is used to construct and maintain social and cultural hierarchies.
· They have shown how genre discourse can be used to subvert and challenge dominant ideologies.
Poststructuralist genre critics have shown that discourse is not simply a neutral tool that can be used to describe genre, but rather a powerful force that shapes and influences our understanding of genre. Their work has helped us to see genre in a new way, and to recognize the ways in which it can be used to promote social and political change.