A teacher comes across the argument that “Parliamentary form of democracy is not suitable for India.” She/He should react by

Correct option is D

The correct approach for the teacher is to neither outright dismiss nor agree with the student's
argument but instead redirect the discussion towards the intentions and provisions of the Constitution.
This encourages critical thinking and helps students understand the rationale behind the chosen form of
governance. A teacher's role is to facilitate a deeper exploration of ideas, guiding students to analyze
different perspectives rather than shutting down the debate or imposing their own views.
Information Booster:
· The teacher should foster an environment where students feel comfortable sharing their views.
· Encourage critical analysis by comparing different governance systems.
· Highlight the historical and cultural context that shaped India's Parliamentary system.
· Discuss the merits and challenges of the Parliamentary democracy in India.
· Help students understand the underlying constitutional principles and democratic values.
Additional Knowledge:
· Reprimanding students: Shutting down dissenting views hampers the development of critical thinking and open dialogue, which are essential in a democratic setup.
· Avoiding hasty judgments: This approach encourages rational thinking but doesn't directly address the substance of the argument.
· Claiming no feasible alternative: While it may seem practical, this discourages exploring other potential governance models, limiting the discussion.
· Redirecting to constitutional intentions: This approach aligns with the democratic principle of informed and critical dialogue. It promotes understanding why the Parliamentary system was chosen and how it functions to uphold democratic values.