Correct option is B
For a deque implemented using two stacks, the
AddFront() operation takes constant time
O(1) as it directly pushes the element onto a stack. However,
AddRear() involves transferring elements between stacks to maintain the correct order, resulting in a time complexity of
O(n) in the worst case, where n is the number of elements in the deque.
Information Booster
1.
Understanding Deque Operations:
·
AddFront(): Adding an element to the front involves a simple push operation on the first stack. This operation is efficient and takes O(1) time.
·
AddRear(): To add an element to the rear, elements need to be transferred between the two stacks to maintain the deque order. This transfer involves n pop and push operations, resulting in O(n) time complexity.
2.
Steps for AddRear():
· Transfer all elements from Stack 1 to Stack 2 (requires n operations).
· Push the new element onto Stack 1.
· Transfer all elements back to Stack 1 from Stack 2 (requires n operations again in the worst case).
3.
Explanation of Complexities:
· O(1) for
AddFront() since it directly pushes the element onto Stack 1 without needing element transfers.
· O(n) for
AddRear() due to the reordering process.
4.
Other Operations:
·
RemoveFront(): Similar to
AddFront(), it involves operations only on Stack 1, taking O(1).
·
RemoveRear(): Similar to
AddRear(), it involves transferring elements between stacks, taking O(n).
Additional Knowledge
·
Stacks in Deque Implementation: Two stacks simulate a deque by dividing responsibilities (Stack 1 for the front, Stack 2 for the rear).
· The efficiency of deque operations using stacks depends on minimizing element transfers.
· Real-world scenarios often optimize deque implementations to avoid excessive O(n) operations.