Which movement was negative enough to be peaceful but positive enough to be effective?

Correct option is A

The correct answer is (a) Non-Cooperation Movement.
· The Non-Cooperation Movement, launched by Mahatma Gandhi in 1920, was characterized by its peaceful yet effective approach to opposing British rule in India.
· The movement involved the refusal to cooperate with the British authorities through non-violent means, such as boycotting British goods, institutions, and services.
· It was negative in the sense that it involved non-cooperation and civil disobedience, but it was positive and effective in mobilizing a large section of the Indian population and raising awareness about the struggle for independence.
· The Non-Cooperation Movement marked a significant shift towards mass participation in the Indian independence struggle and demonstrated the power of non-violent resistance.
Information Booster:
· Swadeshi Movement: The Swadeshi Movement, which began in 1905, focused on promoting Indian-made goods and boycotting British products. It was a significant movement but did not involve the extensive non-cooperation seen in the Non-Cooperation Movement.
· Quit India Movement: The Quit India Movement, launched in 1942, was a more aggressive call for the end of British rule and involved widespread protests and uprisings. It was not characterized by the same level of non-violent non-cooperation as the Non-Cooperation Movement.
· Khilafat Movement: The Khilafat Movement (1919-1924) aimed to protect the Ottoman Caliphate and involved Indian Muslims in the anti-colonial struggle. While it was an important movement, it was not as broadly characterized by the principles of non-cooperation and civil disobedience as the Non-Cooperation Movement.