Correct option is C
The correct answer is (c) 1 and 3
Explanation:
• The muttadars of the Gudem hills had traditional feudal ties and loyalty towards the Bhupathi family of the Golconda zamindari.
• The British refusal to grant annual maintenance to the Bhupathi family caused economic distress and resentment among their dependents (muttadars).
• These two factors undermined traditional authority and provoked repeated uprisings in the Gudem area.
• Statement 2 is not a historically documented cause of the Gudem rebellions.
• The rebellions were primarily a reaction to British interference in local social-political and economic relations.
Information Booster:
• The Gudem–Rampa uprisings form part of tribal resistance to colonial disruption of customary rights.
• Colonial forest and revenue policies further aggravated tribal grievances.
Additional Knowledge:
The feudal affinities of the muttadars with the Bhupathi family of Golconda zamindari (Option 1)
. Traditional loyalty linked local headmen to the Bhupathis.
. British undermining of this relationship fuelled unrest.
Placing the ex-zamindari family on the seat of Golconda (Option 2)
. Not supported by primary accounts as a cause.
. Irrelevant to the specific Gudem uprisings.
British authorities' refusal to grant annual maintenance for the Bhupathi family (Option 3)
. Caused financial insecurity for the family and their dependents.
. Contributed directly to local resentment and rebellion.