The National Human Rights Commission -
(A) Can enquire only on the presentation of a petition of the victim and not suo motu, into complaints of violation of human rights. (B) Cannot intervene in any proceeding involving the violation of human rights pending before any court, under any circumstances.
Which of the above statement/statements is/are correct?

Ans. (d)
Explanation:
Both statements are incorrect:
1. Statement (A) is incorrect because the NHRC can initiate suo motu investigations into complaints of human rights violations, even in the absence of a victim’s petition.
2. Statement (B) is incorrect because the NHRC can intervene in ongoing court proceedings with the court’s permission.
The NHRC, established under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, plays a pivotal role in safeguarding and promoting human rights in India.
Information Booster
1. NHRC is a statutory body, not a constitutional body.
2. Composition: The chairperson is a retired Chief Justice of India, along with other members with expertise in human rights.
3. Powers:
· Suo motu investigations into human rights violations.
· Issuing recommendations to the government on relief measures.
· Reviewing legal safeguards for human rights.
4. Limitations: Cannot enforce its recommendations, and they are advisory in nature.
5. SHRCs (State Human Rights Commissions) function at the state level for similar purposes.
6. Common areas of concern include custodial deaths, bonded labor, and discrimination.
7. NHRC reports are tabled in Parliament for accountability.
Additional Knowledge
· Suo motu powers: Enable NHRC to take up cases based on media reports or public awareness.
· Intervention in court cases: Allowed with judicial consent.
· Human rights violations: Include violations by public authorities or private entities.