Select the most appropriate option that can substitute the highlighted segment in the given sentence.
Five years later, I was eating this same dish at the same restaurant.

Correct option is C

 The correct option to replace the highlighted segment is  am eating.
The highlighted segment  "was eating" is in the  past continuous tense, which is used to describe an action that was ongoing at a specific point in the past. However, in this case, the phrase  "Five years later" refers to the future from a previous reference point. Hence, the tense needs to reflect this correctly.
Options Analysis:
1. (a) will have been eating
· This is  future perfect continuous tense, used to describe an ongoing action that will have been happening by a specific point in the future.
· Example:  By next year, I will have been eating at this restaurant for five years.
· This doesn’t fit the context because "five years later" does not refer to a completed future action but an event that is happening.
2. (b) has been eating
· This is  present perfect continuous tense, used to describe an action that started in the past and continues into the present.
· Example:  She has been eating at this restaurant for years.
· This doesn’t fit because the event is in the future from a past reference point, not ongoing in the present.
3. (c) am eating
· This is  present continuous tense, which describes an action happening right now.
· Given the reference to  "Five years later," it can be interpreted as a specific moment in the future relative to a past event.
· This fits because it describes the speaker's action in that moment in the future.
4. (d) had been eating
· This is  past perfect continuous tense, used to describe an action that was ongoing before another past action.
· Example:  I had been eating when the phone rang.
· This doesn’t fit because the sentence isn't describing an event that happened before another past action.