Correct option is D
Some peanuts are engines.
All coats are shoes.
All shoes are engines.

From statement 2: All coats are shoes.
From statement 3: All shoes are engines.
So, all coats (which are shoes) must also be engines.
Therefore, conclusion (I) follows.
Statement 1 says some peanuts are engines.
Statement 2 says all coats are shoes.
There is no direct or indirect connection between peanuts and coats.
Therefore, conclusion (II) does not follow
Correct answer is (d)