Correct option is A
1.
R v. McNaughten: This is a landmark case from 1843 in English law that established the McNaughten Rules, which define the criteria for the defense of insanity. The case set out that a defendant can be excused from criminal liability if, at the time of the crime, they were suffering from a severe mental illness that prevented them from understanding the nature of their act or knowing that it was wrong.
2.
R v. Govinda: This case deals with the concept of culpable homicide and murder under Sections 299 and 300 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
Information Booster:
1.
McNaughten Rules: These rules are fundamental in determining legal insanity and the ability to stand trial. They focus on the mental state of the defendant at the time of the crime.
2.
Common Intention: Under Indian law, common intention is a crucial principle for establishing joint liability in criminal acts where multiple individuals are involved.
3.
Insanity Defense: This defense can absolve a defendant of criminal liability if mental illness impairs their capacity to understand the nature or wrongfulness of their actions.
Additional Information:
·
(1) R v. McNaughten is related to insanity defense: Correct, as it established the standards for insanity as a legal defense.
·
(2) R v. Govinda is related to common intention: Incorrect, as it deals with culpable homicide and murder under IPC.
