arrow
arrow
arrow
“No poets are scientists. Some artists are poets. Therefore some artists are scientists.” Which formal fallacy is committed in this argument?
Question

“No poets are scientists. Some artists are poets. Therefore some artists are scientists.” Which formal fallacy is committed in this argument?

A.

Denying the antecedent

B.

Exclusive premises

C.

Fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premise

D.

Existential fallacy

Correct option is C

Argument Given:

  1. Premise 1 (E-type):No poets are scientists.(Universal Negative)

  2. Premise 2 (I-type):Some artists are poets.(Particular Affirmative)

  3. Conclusion (I-type):Therefore, some artists are scientists.(Particular Affirmative)

Analysis of the Fallacy

  • A valid syllogism cannot have a negative premise and an affirmative conclusion.

  • Here,Premise 1 is negative("No poets are scientists"), but theconclusion is affirmative("some artists are scientists").

  • This violates therule against deriving an affirmative conclusion from a negative premise.

Free Tests

Free
Must Attempt

Basics of Education: Pedagogy, Andragogy, and Hutagogy

languageIcon English
  • pdpQsnIcon10 Questions
  • pdpsheetsIcon20 Marks
  • timerIcon12 Mins
languageIcon English
Free
Must Attempt

UGC NET Paper 1 Mock Test 1

languageIcon English
  • pdpQsnIcon50 Questions
  • pdpsheetsIcon100 Marks
  • timerIcon60 Mins
languageIcon English
Free
Must Attempt

Basics of Education: Pedagogy, Andragogy, and Hutagogy

languageIcon English
  • pdpQsnIcon10 Questions
  • pdpsheetsIcon20 Marks
  • timerIcon12 Mins
languageIcon English

Similar Questions

test-prime-package

Access ‘UGC NET December’ Mock Tests with

  • 60000+ Mocks and Previous Year Papers
  • Unlimited Re-Attempts
  • Personalised Report Card
  • 500% Refund on Final Selection
  • Largest Community
students-icon
354k+ students have already unlocked exclusive benefits with Test Prime!
Our Plans
Monthsup-arrow