Match List I with List II.

List I                              List II

(A) Reg v. Govinda      1. Insanity

(B) State of Maharashtra v. M.N. George      2. Common Intention

(C) Mahboob Shah v. Emperor       3. Murder

(D) McNaghten Case        4. Mens Rea

A B C D

Correct option is C

The correct matching is as follows

(A) Reg v. Govinda - 3 (Murder)

(B) State of Maharashtra v. M.N. George - 4 (Mens Rea)

(C) Mahboob Shah v. Emperor - 2 (Common Intention)

(D) McNaghten Case - 1 (Insanity)

Information Booster
· Reg v. Govinda: A leading case that explains the distinction between culpable homicide and murder.
· State of Maharashtra v. M.N. George: Discusses the principle of mens rea.
· Mahboob Shah v. Emperor: A landmark case on the doctrine of common intention under Section 34 IPC.
· McNaghten Case: A foundational case that established the legal test for insanity, influencing Section 84 IPC.