Correct option is A
A) Objections to jurisdiction
Kiran Singh V. Chaman Paswan (1954): This case established that
objections to jurisdiction can be raised at any stage of the proceedings. The Supreme Court held that a decree passed by a court without jurisdiction is a nullity and can be challenged even in execution proceedings. Correct Match:
2
B) Addition of Parties
Razia Begum V. Sahebzadi Anwar Begum (1958): In this case, the Supreme Court held that the
addition of parties is permissible if their presence is necessary to decide the issues in the suit. It emphasized the necessity of having all relevant parties to ensure complete adjudication. Correct Match:
1
C) Constructive res judicata
Workmen V. Board of Trustees, Cochin Port Trust (1978): This case is often cited to explain
constructive res judicata, a principle that prevents parties from raising claims that could have been made in a previous suit but were not. Correct Match:
4
D) Temporary injunction
American Cyanamid Co. V. Ethicon Ltd. (1975): This UK case set the modern standard for granting a
temporary injunction. It emphasizes the "balance of convenience" and the need to ensure that no irreparable harm is caused pending the final outcome of a trial. Correct Match:
3
