Correct option is A
The case of Udhav Singh V. Madhav Rao Scindia is widely known for defining and elaborating the concept of material facts in pleadings. The Supreme Court of India in this case emphasized that material facts are those facts that must be pleaded by a party to establish their case, and without which the case would fail. The court further clarified that these facts should give the opponent a clear idea of the case they are to meet, ensuring fairness in the legal process.
Information Booster
Material Facts in Pleadings:
·
Material facts refer to the essential facts that constitute the plaintiff’s cause of action or the defendant’s defense.
· The purpose of pleading material facts is to ensure that both parties have clarity about the case and the legal issues involved, without unnecessary detail or evidence at the initial stage.
· These facts are vital in determining the issues for trial and enable the court to decide on the relevance and admissibility of evidence during the trial.
Udhav Singh V. Madhav Rao Scindia (1976)
In this case, the Supreme Court stressed that the statement of facts in pleadings must be clear and specific, and should contain only
material facts. Pleadings are not meant to include detailed evidence but rather the facts necessary to establish the legal rights or defenses involved in the case.
Additional Knowledge
(b) A. R. Antulay V. R. S. Nayak: This case deals with judicial bias and the transfer of cases, not with the definition of material facts in pleadings.
(c) State of Haryana V. State of Punjab: This case focuses on issues related to water disputes and is unrelated to pleadings.
(d) State of Uttar Pradesh V. Nawab Hussain: This case addresses the concept of res judicata but does not define material facts in pleadings.
