arrow
arrow
arrow
In which one of the following cases was it held that partition is not a transfer of property?
Question

In which one of the following cases was it held that partition is not a transfer of property?

A.

V.N. Sarin v. Ajeet Kumar AIR 1986 SC 432

B.

Roked Chand v. Smt. Rajeshwari Devi AIR 2009 NOC 3009

C.

Abdul Jabbar v. Venkata Shastri AIR 1969 SC 1147

D.

None of the above

Correct option is A


In the case of V.N. Sarin v. Ajeet Kumar AIR 1986 SC 432, the Supreme Court held that partition is not a transfer of property. It is merely a division of jointly held property among co-owners, and no new title is created. Each co-owner already had a title to the entire property before partition.
Information Booster
Partition is a method to divide joint ownership into individual ownership, where each co-owner’s share becomes separate property. This ruling clarifies that partition is not a conveyance or transfer as defined under the Transfer of Property Act.
Additional Knowledge
· Roked Chand v. Smt. Rajeshwari Devi and Abdul Jabbar v. Venkata Shastri: Do not pertain to the issue of partition.

test-prime-package

Access ‘State Judiciary PCS J’ Mock Tests with

  • 60000+ Mocks and Previous Year Papers
  • Unlimited Re-Attempts
  • Personalised Report Card
  • 500% Refund on Final Selection
  • Largest Community
students-icon
354k+ students have already unlocked exclusive benefits with Test Prime!
test-prime-package

Access ‘State Judiciary PCS J’ Mock Tests with

  • 60000+ Mocks and Previous Year Papers
  • Unlimited Re-Attempts
  • Personalised Report Card
  • 500% Refund on Final Selection
  • Largest Community
students-icon
354k+ students have already unlocked exclusive benefits with Test Prime!
Our Plans
Monthsup-arrow